
Joseph Sibony
reading time:
Welcome to the wild world of end to end (E2E) testing, where we put ourselves in the user’s shoes and examine an app from their perspective.
Your mission? To ensure every piece of the application works together seamlessly “in the wild” — meaning in real-world scenarios across different platforms and user behaviors.
So gear up as we trek through the treacherous terrain of E2E testing, uncovering why it’s important and how you can master it to create robust, user-friendly applications.
Imagine you’ve built a complex machine with countless moving parts. Naturally, you’d want to ensure that when you press the “ON” button, it performs its every intended function flawlessly from start to finish.
This is what end to end software testing aims to achieve for software applications.
The E2E testing process analyzes app functionality from a user’s first contact with the app to the moment they close it. The goal is to validate an app’s functionality and performance by simulating real-world usage scenarios.
There are two main flavors of E2E testing — horizontal and vertical — each with their own special sauce:
Horizontal E2E testing simulates the user experience from start to finish. It targets the front end — how things look, feel, and perform from the user’s point of view across different operating systems, browsers, and devices, including:
Vertical E2E testing focuses on the back-end functionality, ensuring all connections work, data flows correctly, and processes run between app layers without exceptions, including:
Let’s face it — users will always find ways to use your app that you never imagined.
E2E testing helps catch unpredictable “Why is the user doing that?!” moments before they become “Why is our app broken?!” situations. These practices are also defined in international standards such as ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-1:2022. It’s particularly useful for capturing issues like:
RELATED: Tools For DevOps Testing: Here’s What Actually Works
Implementing E2E testing isn’t a push-button process — it involves planning, execution, and analysis. We can break it down into four stages:
Once you’ve confirmed that your app’s modules can actually talk to each other (integration testing), it’s time to outline your E2E test objectives:
This is where the rubber meets the road. You’ll create your test environments, build the actual tests, and conduct risk and usage analysis:
The “let’s break stuff” phase. It’s time to run the tests. This involves:
The postmortem, where you figure out what went wrong, why it went wrong, and how to fix it, including:
E2E testing isn’t just another checkbox on your QA to-do list — it’s a potent tool for creating software that people actually enjoy and don’t write bad reviews about. Here’s why it’s worth its weight in gold:
E2E testing isn’t all smooth sailing, which you might attest to if you’ve tried it before! Here are three hurdles you’ll need to jump:
Determined to master E2E testing? Great — a brave new world awaits you! — but keep these best practices in mind:
While E2E testing and integration testing are both critical to the software testing process, they have distinct characteristics.
E2E testing explores app behavior from the user’s perspective. Conversely, integration testing focuses on verifying the interactions between different components or modules of a system to ensure they work together correctly.
It’s a bit like this: While integration testing is like checking if all the LEGO pieces fit together, E2E testing is building the entire LEGO Death Star and making sure it can (metaphorically) destroy planets.
Here’s a comparison table to break down the key differences:
| Aspect | End to end testing | Integration testing |
| Scope | Entire application workflow | Interactions between integrated units/modules |
| Focus | User experience and overall functionality | Data flow and interaction between modules |
| Complexity | Greater, due to testing the entire system | Moderate, as it focuses on subsystems |
| Purpose | Ensure the system meets business requirements and user expectations | Verify combined parts work together correctly |
| User perspective | Simulates real-world user scenarios | Does not focus on the user perspective |
| Environment | Realistic environments simulating production | Controlled environment simulating part of the production system |
| Test coverage | Broad, covering multiple user scenarios and workflows | Narrower, covering specific integrations |
| Execution | Requires extensive setup and more resources | Less extensive setup, fewer resources required |
| Benefits | Ensures end to end functionality, catches high-level issues early | Ensures modules work together, catches issues in module interactions |
| Typical issues found | End to end process failures, user flow issues, performance bottlenecks | Integration issues, data mismatches, communication failures |
| Tools | Selenium, Cypress, TestCafe, Playwright | JUnit, NUnit, TestNG, Postman |
| Timing in testing cycle | Performed after integration testing | Performed after unit testing, and before E2E testing |
| Example | Testing a user’s journey from login to checkout in an e-commerce app | Testing the interaction between the payment processing and inventory systems |
E2E testing is the final gauntlet before your app confronts the chaos of the real world — an opportunity you must use wisely!
Remember, this is not just about finding bugs — it’s about ensuring your application delivers the experience and functionality your users expect.
One thing you’ll probably find is that even when you master the art of E2E testing, long test runs might eat into your development time, especially if you’re dealing with limited compute power.
This is where tools like Incredibuild can step in to speed up your testing process without sacrificing quality. Incredibuild accelerates computationally intensive software development tasks — a perfect fit for high-quality E2E testing at scale. Here’s what it brings to the E2E testing table:
With Incredibuild, you can identify issues earlier, iterate faster, and ultimately deliver higher-quality software to your users.
Don’t let slow E2E testing hold back your development speed or software quality — book a demo with Incredibuild and level up your test workflows today.
User acceptance testing (UAT) involves actual end users testing the app to ensure it meets their needs and expectations. E2E testing is typically performed by the development team, while UAT is conducted by or with the client or end users.
E2E testing checks the entire application flow, while regression testing ensures new changes haven’t broken existing functionality. Regression testing is often defined as a subset of E2E testing, focused on verifying that recent changes haven’t negatively impacted existing features.
An e-commerce site is a good example of how end to end testing can be used in software testing. You’d test the entire process of logging in, searching for a product, adding it to the cart, applying a discount code, checking out, receiving an order confirmation email, and then verifying the order in the admin panel.
This scenario tests multiple interconnected systems (user authentication, product catalog, shopping cart, payment processing, email services, and admin interfaces) in a single flow, just as a real user would experience.
As we can see, E2E testing is all about putting yourself in the user’s shoes and ensuring that every step of their journey through your application is smooth and error free.
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-1:2022. (n.d.). ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/81291.html
Table of Contents
Shorten your builds
Incredibuild empowers your teams to be productive and focus on innovating.
Incredibuild empowers your teams to be productive and focus on innovating.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |