Incredibuild Team
reading time:
Imagine an AI that doesn’t wait for you to tell it “do this next.” It figures out what needs doing, plans the steps, and executes the task. Meanwhile, it may even call in “assistant AIs” of its own. That’s the promise (and the hype) of agentic AI. And it’s already nudging its way into software development.
Key Takeaways
- Agentic AI is autonomous and goal-driven, able to plan and act without constant human prompts.
- It’s reshaping software development through smarter onboarding, collaboration, coding, and testing.
- Teams can use agentic AI t to automate routine work while keeping humans in charge of oversight and strategy.
- Risks like hallucinations, security gaps, and hidden logic create a demand for strong governance
What Is Agentic AI?
Agentic AI refers to AI systems that can act autonomously to achieve goals, without needing step-by-step instructions from humans.
This type of AI breaks down objectives into subtasks, makes decisions, adapts when things go off course.
To put it loosely: generative AI is like a really smart pen (you ask, it writes). Agentic AI is like a proactive project manager (you set the goal, it figures out how to get there).
Because of that “agency,” it can tackle multi-step, longer workflows instead of just handling single prompts.
AI Agents vs Agentic AI
This is a subtle but important distinction. Many people use the terms interchangeably, but here’s how scholars draw the line:
| Feature | AI Agent | Agentic AI |
| Scope | Narrow, task-oriented | Broad, goal-oriented, multi-step |
| Autonomy | Limited (often guided or reactive) | Higher autonomy, proactive planning |
| Coordination | Single agent or loosely coordinated | Orchestration of multiple agents |
| Memory / Persistence | Shallow, session-limited | Persistent memory, context across tasks |
| Adaptability | Some adaptation, within narrow bounds | Strong adaptation, can reorganize strategy |
| Use cases | Specific automation, tool integration | End-to-end workflows, planning + execution |
AI agents are good at precise, bounded tasks, while agentic AI handles real-world complexity and adaptation. They are the next step toward being more human.
Applications in Software Development
This is where things get exciting (and a little scary). Agentic AI is starting to creep into real dev workflows. Let’s survey some of the key areas.
New Developer Onboarding
One of the biggest friction points in teams is getting newcomers up to speed (e.g., understanding the codebase, grasping architectures, figuring out dev environment setup, etc).
An agentic AI could:
- Read project documentation, source code, commit history, architecture diagrams
- Suggest a tailored “learning path” for the new dev
- Automatically set up the dev environment (install required packages, scaffold configs)
- Answer in-context questions (“Which module handles user auth?”), or point to code examples
- Monitor early code contributions and give feedback
That means less time spent chasing down mentors and more time coding (or napping, whichever you prefer).
Team Collaboration
Coordination overhead can be expensive: tracking tasks, managing dependencies, orchestrating handoffs, and ensuring everyone’s aware of changes.
Agentic AI could help by:
- Monitoring issue trackers, pull requests, code changes
- Notifying devs or auto-assigning follow-ups
- Suggesting or mediating merges, conflict resolutions, or syncs
- Summarizing design proposals or meeting notes to keep everyone on the same page
You can imagine an AI tool that watches your backlog and says: “Hey, Alice’s PR is blocking Bob’s work. Should we refactor module M to reduce coupling?” Or automatically scheduling a sync when dependencies shift.
Automated Coding
Yes, this is the big one. Generative AI is already helping write snippets; agentic AI goes further:
- From a high-level feature description, it plans subcomponents, generates skeleton code, and wires them together
- It calls compilers or static analysis tools to catch errors, refines the code, and iterates
- It invokes APIs, scaffolds database access, and integrates modules
- It can divide work among internal “micro-agents” each handling, e.g., UI, backend, data access
A recent survey on “AI agentic programming”* covers exactly this: systems that decompose goals, use tool integration, monitor execution, and adapt.
CI/CD Pipeline Optimization
Continuous integration and continuous delivery can be noisy and brittle. Agentic AI could:
- Monitor build failures and flaky tests
- Diagnose root causes (e.g., dependency update, merge conflict)
- Automatically trigger fixes (e.g., bump a package version, adjust configuration)
- Prioritize test suites, parallelize tests, or roll back faulty deployments
- Adapt pipelines over time for speed and reliability
Essentially, it becomes a self-healing, self-optimizing DevOps assistant.
Code Review and Testing
Code reviews are tedious. Testing is even more so. Agentic AI can lend a hand:
- Review pull requests for style, logical correctness, performance, security
- Suggest improvements or call in subagents for deeper static analysis
- Generate test cases, especially edge cases
- Run fuzzing, property tests, or simulated environments autonomously
- Flag risky patterns, security vulnerabilities, or flaky behavior
With an agentic reviewer, you might push code and immediately get a detailed review, more consistent than a tired human reviewer late on Friday afternoon.
Risks of Using Agentic AI for Software Development
We aren’t handing you a doom scroll, but yes, there are serious caveats.
Hallucinations, Incorrect Logic, and Cascading Errors
Because these systems make decisions, an incorrect judgment early in a chain might lead to large downstream mistakes.
Transparency and Explainability
If the AI “magically” changes the architecture or rewrites modules, understanding why becomes harder.
Security, access, and malicious behavior
If an agent has access to internal systems, builds, or deployment tools, what if it’s compromised?
Data Privacy, Compliance, and IP Issues
Agentic AI may call internal tools, access sensitive repositories, or data. Guardrails are essential.
Oversight, Governance, and Human in the Loop
You can’t assume full autonomy. You must define decision boundaries, escalation rules, and safety nets.
Over-trust, Skill Erosion, and Complacency
If devs stop thinking critically (“The AI did it, it must be right”), quality may degrade.
Infrastructure costs, Context Limits, Memory, Coordination
These models need computing resources. They struggle with very large contexts or long memory across tasks.
Legal, Ethical, and Liability Gray Zones
Who is responsible if the agent introduces a bug, forks a license violation, or leaks data? Academic work on fluid autonomy and authorship already flags these issues.
So yes: exciting, but hazardous terrain.
What’s Next?
We’re still in the early phases. But here’s where things seem headed:
- Maturing architectures & orchestration: Better frameworks to coordinate multi-agent systems, memory management, and hierarchical planning.
- Agentic SE toolchains: Tools tailored for agentic software engineering (e.g., “Agent Command Environments”) are emerging in research.
- Hybrid human + agent teams: Systems where humans and agents collaborate tightly.
- Governance, safety, explainability research: To make these systems trustworthy and auditable.
- Benchmarking, evaluation, standards: We’ll need metrics to evaluate agentic systems (correctness, robustness, alignment).
- Domain-specific agentic systems: Tailored agents for security, DevOps, and architecture, rather than one-size-fits-all.
In short, over the next few years, agentic AI may shift from “interesting experiment” to “essential teammate.”
FAQs about Agentic AI in Software Development
Will agentic AI replace software engineers?
Unlikely (at least not in the near future). More realistically, it will augment engineers by taking on mundane, repetitive tasks so human devs can focus on strategy, architecture, creativity, and debugging tricky edge cases.
Can I trust agentic AI with my codebase, security credentials, or production systems?
Only with strong safeguards: permission boundaries, audit trails, human approvals on critical steps, monitoring, and rollback.
What kinds of errors does agentic AI tend to make?
AI tends to make logical mistakes and assumptions. Other errors include hallucinated APIs, misinterpretation of ambiguous specs, overfitting to test feedback, or reinforcing bugs across chained actions.
Does agentic AI require a big, expensive stack?
Yes, it tends to demand stronger infrastructure (compute, model hosting, memory, tool integration). But over time, optimizations and model efficiencies may lower the barrier.
What’s the first “safe” place to experiment with agentic AI in dev?
Noncritical pipelines: test environments, static analysis, code reviews, documentation scaffolding. Start small and design clear human oversights.
Sources:
*Wang, H., Gong, J., Zhang, H., Xu, J., & Wang, Z. (2025, August 15). AI Agentic Programming: A survey of techniques, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11126
Table of Contents
Shorten your builds
Incredibuild empowers your teams to be productive and focus on innovating.